Search This Blog

Showing posts with label Hunter Derby. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Hunter Derby. Show all posts

Tuesday, December 18, 2012

The One Where I Want To Punch Something

Dear readers, RiderWriter is pretty angry right now.

Why?

Because I just opened FB to discover a post from Chronicle of the Horse, with a link to an article about Kelley Farmer debuting some new Hunter Derby horses this past weekend. How nice for her but big deal, right? Well, it WAS a big deal when I read the rest of the title:


Kelley Farmer Has A New Crop In Action At Lake St. Louis Hunter Derby


WHAT??? NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!

Needless to say, I was not there. Oh, no, I was sitting in my house not doing much of anything, completely oblivious to the fact that there was a $25,000 USHJA Hunter Derby going on 10 minutes away. Which would have been only the second real Derby I've ever gotten to see, having enjoyed every second of the first one. And where Kelley Farmer showed up, all the way from Wellington, to win the thing with her top horse Taken and roll out her new ones.

I am just ill. 
Yeah, yeah, yeah, it's Kelley and Taken. The ones I didn't see win. 
Now, I did know that there was a H/J horse show this weekend. I'd seen the trailers on our main drag, and I do try to keep up with the schedule at the National Equestrian Center. But I thought it was just another Winter Series show, not a big whoop-de-doo with a HUNTER DERBY.

*Goes off to stomp something, and breathe into a paper bag*

Just so you all know what I missed, here's the article. Have fun reading it. I'll have to settle for hoping you would have enjoyed my write-up, too, had I simply been there. I tried to call the NEC to see if they might be doing any more of these any time soon/the next six months, but they're on holiday break. Take it from me, there was no mention of this event on their stupid website. It's not helping that I already missed the other big Derby this year, too, at the Charity Show because of "something" I had to do at the same time. I forget what it was but I hope it was important!

Alright, I guess I've calmed down now. My blog has to be good for something. :-) It's only a horse show... And my next post will be about a really special horse show that I did go to! 

Tuesday, September 18, 2012

2012 Region 5 Maclay Finals

Bad Blogger here: I'm afraid that lately I've been doing a lot of writing on certain bulletin boards, instead of my own blog. More immediate feedback! However, I know that my past posts on Maclay classes have been pretty popular, so I'm back to give the RiderWriter view of the Region 5 final. Judges were Geoff Teal and Mary Lisa Leffler.

Here is the course:
It was designed by Richard Jeffery, from Bournemouth, England. Here are the riders/horses:
Sorry for the lousy photo... this is my only copy of the entries and I did my best.
It's not your eyes!
There were 31 entries. I noticed a number of people I remembered from last year, and one really obvious thing: NO boys at all! I guess all the guys from this region have aged out.

As I think you can tell from the map, the course was very twisty with lots of bending lines. What was really interesting is that a lot of the jumps were natural. Fence 1 is on the left in this photo:


It's hard to see in these pictures, but there was a zig-zag line of post-and-rails down the middle of the ring. The whole thing looked very Derby-ish, actually. As they did two at the show this isn't wholly surprising, and I know I saw quite a few of these Maclay horses and riders in the 3' Derby last Friday night. At any rate, I thought this was really cool for a Maclay class, and a good development.

I have to say, though, that I was a bit surprised at which jump caused the most trouble. Not a post-and-rail, not one of the "fake tree" fences (which my dog barked at hysterically when they moved them between rounds at the Friday Derby, much to my chagrin) - no, it was the fairly ordinary-looking stone wall. Here's just one of a number of unfortunate refusals:
In addition to the refusals there were a lot of chips, a deer jump or two, and somebody plowed right through it. What was the big deal? The long bending line, or the appearance? I'm not sure.

It definitely took a skilled rider to make this course look smooth. Most people didn't achieve that, and the ones who did stood out. Everybody sorted out into three groups: a top group, a middle group who rode pretty well, and those who had a refusal or a bunch of chips. I only saw one rider who was a jumped-loose trainwreck from start to finish and made me wonder how on earth she qualified.
The nervous crowd of trainers, grooms, parents and friends at the in-gate.
You could feel the tension.
Accordingly, I mostly agreed with the groupings for the flat phase. There were three; I thought it was nice that they allowed everyone to come back. They were asked for the usual W/T/C in both directions, although it was "mixed up" with a number of random transitions. I was surprised again when they were not asked for any extensions. I guarantee you they will be in KY! Also, no dropping of stirrups and posting the trot. I remember when that was de rigeur for a flat phase.

Nobody moved up from the bottom group but one rider did from the second group, and I was very happy about that since she's one of my favorites (go, Bethany!). Six were called back to test from the high group and I picked the top three, so I was pleased with my eye. (I may know what good equitation on the flat looks like, but just don't ask me to do it, LOL). One thing I noticed that really amused me; I spent a lot of time back in my junior days being told to turn my *(&#!)^@ toes in. This clearly does not matter a whit anymore. Lots of highly-placed toes out past George's "maximum 45-degree angle!"

The test was hard, harder than the last few I've seen (two years ago, IIRC, there was no test, which I thought was a shame). All the jumps were arranged in a zig-zag down the middle of the ring. It went like this:

- Counter-canter #8
- Hand-gallop to #12 (a long ways, about half the ring)
- Canter #5
- Halt
- Counter-canter #1
- Trot the stone wall, #2 (lowered to 2')
- Sitting trot, then walk out

The test course, from the other side of the ring:

The first rider to return lost her first counter-canter, had no gallop, a late halt and made a complete hash of the trot jump, barely trotting it and then knocking it down. Not pretty. The second rider also had just an okay, short trot. Once again, this surprised me since surely they practice these plenty - maybe just not walls? The last four to test did much better and Hunter Holloway really nailed it, which moved her from second to first place. I especially liked her real gallop (if you've read my entry about the national Final last year you know this is a pet peeve), but she also had a text-book trot fence, quiet halt and an authoritative sitting trot.

[Side note: Hunter's mom Brandi won the $25,000 GP earlier Saturday, so it was quite a day for the Holloway girls!]

I mostly agreed with the final ranking of the riders. Hunter absolutely deserved the win, that's for sure; she was poised, effective and just looked like she knew what she was doing. I think this additional year of experience has helped her a lot and she'll do very well at the Finals. Let's keep the Region 5 streak going!

Results:
1. Hunter Holloway
2. Caroline McLeece
3. Kristin Lutz
4. Katherine Woodruff
5. Savannah Talcott
6. Kaitlyn Alsup
7. Barbara Ann Merryman
8. Emily Hartley
9. Landrie Folsom
10. Bethany Bolan
11. K C Thompson
12. Blair Julia Wright
13. Mackenzie Clark
14. Reily Reiker
15. Colleen McKenzie

Random attire/tack observations: I saw an equal number of CO helmets (GR8 and AYR8) and GPA Speed Airs. The Lady Speed Airs (with a giant brim) just look goofy indoors. :-) The usual navy jackets, some with an extremely subtle pinstripe. Seemed like an equal number of wrap and traditional choker-collared shirts. I did not know you could still monogram a wrap collar, but I prefer the traditional nonetheless. Most of the horses wore jumping boots front and back, in a color that "blended in." I guess that's okay in an Eq class, because you still can't have them in Hunters as far as I know.

The top 11 from here will go to KY. Good luck, ladies!

Wednesday, October 12, 2011

The Derby (Not in KY!)

NOTE: I've been very frustrated, because I suddenly have about a dozen topics I'm itching to cover here, and the rest of my life temporarily took over. I have many volunteer commitments and unfortunately two of the biggest ones hit critical point in the last week and a half. But the 40-pg. directory/yearbook I had to create is at the printer's, and all the new Girl Scouts are placed in a troop, so I can finally get back to this post and the other two I also started! :-)

*  *  *

I have to say, without a doubt, that the USHJA Hunter Derby was one of my most favorite things I've ever gotten to see in the horse world. I wish they had them here every weekend. Even though it was threatening to rain, and they had to move the event indoors, watching those top-notch horses go was just a BLAST. Despite years and years of watching hunters show, I finally feel like I really know what makes a good hunter horse now.

I know I mentioned some of the rules and such about the Hunter Derby in a past blog, but I would like to refer you to this post by a fellow blogger, which explains things ever so much better. In fact, I really wish I'd read her post before watching the class! Jennifer also took some great photos, which she has graciously allowed me to borrow as needed. Needless to say, I didn't get any myself...

Anyway, I was simply amazed at what happened before the class even started. The show allowed schooling in the ring after all the jumps were set up; no jumping, but walking, trotting and cantering around. I couldn't believe my eyes when the horses and riders started streaming in. I have never, ever ever seen this allowed before any class before. The riders frequently cantered the horses right up to the jumps, literally until their noses were touching them, and then stopped. There were also grooms leading some of the horses around and they, too, were led right up to the jumps until their noses touched. All the horses were encouraged to sniff and look at the fences.

Obviously the horses were being shown the jumps; I knew what was happening. What I didn't get was why this was allowed. Not being one to stifle questions, I asked two fellow bystanders, one of whom was a rider wearing a shadbelly and thus planning to ride in the class, why on earth this was going on. "They want this to be a good class without refusals so the horses are allowed to see the jumps and get familiar with the course," was the answer. Well, okay, but considering I *think* that it's against the rules to do too much "showing of the jumps" to jumpers before they start, or to ride your warm-up circle three laps around a hunter ring, I found this pretty darn interesting. I also had to wonder if "showing" horses jumps actually works - what do you guys think?

Here are the course maps for both rounds of the Hunter Derby:
And here's two photos I took of a simply enormous oxer that was the last jump on course (upper left corner of both maps). At least, the "high" side was enormous; the other half was regular height:

They had to squeeze the far end standards together a bit to narrow the width for the lower side. This jump was sufficiently intimidating that very few of the riders actually attempted the high side, despite the increase in points. Those that did try looked from the rear (my view) like they were jumping the moon and it was clearly a great effort.

The horses in this class, needless to say, were gaw-jus. Here's one entrant prior to going in the ring (had to get one of the greys, of course):
I wish I could have gotten a little better conformation shot, because one of the most fascinating aspects of this class for me was checking out the way the horses were made and the way they went. I have a confession: I've ridden H/J practically my whole life. Since about 1975 I've been a manic reader of "Practical Horseman," especially "Conformation Clinic" (remember when Champ Hough used to write it?). I have really gotten a lot out of the past year's worth of Clinics, with the new judge. I usually do well with my placings and have a decent grasp of what makes good conformation. I know that a jumping horse is supposed to round its back in a bascule over fences. I've been in and watched literally hundreds and hundreds of hunter classes. But it really wasn't until watching this class that I started putting all the pieces together and figuring out what, exactly, is the proper construction and way of going for a truly good hunter. Something finally just clicked!

The way I saw it, the best horses "poured themselves" over the fences. The whole jump looked effortless, one smooth motion of beautiful, elastic horse. Like I said, I don't know what it was about this class but I swear I really, truly saw it for the very first time. It was great!
Whew, talk about round! I'd like to feel that just once - over a lower fence. (Photo by Jennifer Buxton)
Some other things I noticed about these horses were:
- Great extension of their front legs at all gaits (the Conf. Clinic lady is always going on about length and angle of humerus - I GET it now!)
- A walk with a very swinging back and a lot of overstep
- A croup that tended to be a bit more level
- A naturally low neck and head set, completing a level topline
This lovely horse illustrates ALL of the above points (Photo by Jennifer Buxton)
If any of you are thinking, well, DUH, RiderWriter, I'm sorry for my ignorance! I'm just excited that at the ripe old age of 48 I'm really connecting the dots. The more you learn, the less you find out you know...

Regarding way of going, I discovered the judges did not care for the horse that was big-striding, knee-lifting and went very fast. They also didn't like a small horse that went with its nose poked out and was also very fast. Oddly, the other horse I noticed that carried his head far in front of the vertical really split the judge's opinion: one scored him 83, the other 60! Normally the scores were five points apart at the most. I myself wasn't wild about that horse. But get this: he was 5th in the nation in the standings heading into the Derby finals this year, and finished 9th there! So that was a bit confusing.

In general, though, I agreed with the scoring. My very favorite horse, who I thought was just the epitome of class and beauty, finished third (he'd gotten 6th at the Derby finals), so I was good with that. His owner rode him, and another entrant that also belonged to her. What, two horses in this class? How lucky is she? Well, this is how lucky - there were three more ridden by a pro. Yes, this girl - a teenager - owned five horses in this class. FIVE! Horses of this caliber don't exactly come cheap, so we're talking, what, a half million dollars worth of horseflesh, all belonging to one kid??? Sheesh. Yes, she was a very decent rider, she'd actually been in the Maclay finals (riding one of her Derby horses) but finished well out of the ribbons. I was floored...
The second round of the Derby featured this trot in-and-out combo:
The second trot jump is the low double-log thing in the very middle of photo, on the left.
You can also see the rustic rail fences forming the "wings" of this complex (look on course map again). I believe there were a couple of stops here, but not because of any fright factor; it was pilot error. Nonetheless, it would certainly give me pause riding up to these. I'm pretty sure I jumped similar back in the day on the outside 4-H courses, but now a stiff post-and-rail would make my knees knock. And definitely not on one of these back-cracking beauties - no question of where I'd wind up! :-)

So that's my little roundup of the Hunter Derby. I personally found it super-exciting to watch - I actually had cold chills. If you have the opportunity to view one of these classes, I highly recommend it.